Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:41

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Chevy Teases a New Corvette 'X' to Debut Next Week - Road & Track
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Does anybody believe in cultural appropriation?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
7 Surprising Home and Garden Mistakes That Could Be Making Your Allergies Worse - Yahoo
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Which country has the best and strictest legal system in the world?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Are there any nude pictures of women with big tits?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Whitesides says budget proposal shows the administration does not value NASA science - SpaceNews
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Hailee Steinfeld Marries Bills QB Josh Allen - The Hollywood Reporter
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
James Webb Space Telescope discovers planets forming in space's most punishing environments - Space